7/28/2003

not exactly a meritocracy

Eric Alterman's guest blogger David Sirota demonstrates what Lexis Nexis is for:


CONDI�S AMAZING SEPTEMBER 11TH STORY - FALSELY CLAIMED WHITE HOUSE HAD NO PRIOR WARNING OF HIJACKINGS
On May 16th, 2002, Rice said �I don�t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon. [No one predicted] that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile,�[CBS News, 5/17/02]. But according to the bipartisan 9/11 commission report, �intelligence reports from December 1998 until the attacks said followers of bin Laden were planning to strike U.S. targets, hijack U.S. planes, and two individuals had successfully evaded checkpoints in a dry run at a New York airport,� [Reuters, 7/24/03]. More specifically, �White House officials acknowledged that U.S. intelligence officials informed President Bush weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks that bin Laden�s terrorist network might try to hijack American planes.� [ABC News, 5/16/03]

CONDI�S AMAZING PEACE STORY - PUBLICLY CLAIMED TO SEEK PEACE, WHILE TELLING STATE DEPT. WAR PRE-DETERMINED
Throughout 2002 and early 2003, Rice repeatedly insisted that the Administration sought a peaceful solution to the Iraq conflict and that war was only a last resort. In October of 2002, she said, �We�re going to seek a peaceful solution to this. We think that one is possible� [CBS, 10/20/02]. Then in November of 2002, she said, �We all want very much to see this resolved in a peaceful way� [Briefing, 11/21/02]. In March of 2003, she claimed �we are still in a diplomatic phase here� [ABC, 3/9/03]. However, according to Richard Haas, Bush�s director of policy planning at the State Department, the decision had already been made by July of 2002. When asked exactly when he learned war in Iraq was definite, Haas said, �The moment was the first week of July (2002), when I had a meeting with Condi. I raised this issue about were we really sure that we wanted to put Iraq front and center at this point, given the war on terrorism and other issues. And she said, essentially, that that decision�s been made, don�t waste your breath. And that was early July. So then when Powell had his famous dinner with the President, in early August, 2002 [in which Powell persuaded Bush to take the question to the U.N.] the agenda was not whether Iraq, but how� [New Yorker, 3/31/03]

CONDI�S AMAZING IRAQ-NUKE STORY #1 - FALSELY CLAIMED WHITE HOUSE DID NOT KNOW OF NUCLEAR MISGIVINGS
When questioned about why she did not raise objections to the bogus Iraq-nuclear claim in Bush�s State of the Union speech, Rice said on July 8 that �no one in our circles knew that there were doubts and suspicions that this might be a forgery� [AP, 7/23/03] However, 15 days later, the White House acknowledged that �the CIA sent two memos to the White House in October voicing strong doubts about a claim President Bush made three months later in the State of the Union address that Iraq was trying to buy nuclear material in Africa� [Washington Post, 7/23/03].

CONDI�S AMAZING IRAQ-NUKE STORY #2 - ADMITTED WHITE HOUSE KNEW MISGIVINGS, FALSELY CLAIMED CIA APPROVED
Rice told reporters on July 11th that the CIA �cleared the speech in its entirety.� As AP reported, �if Tenet, the CIA director, had any misgivings, he never shared them with the White House,� she said. However, �Stephen Hadley, Rice�s top aide, said on July 23 that in fact he received two memos from the CIA and a phone call from Tenet last October warning him that evidence that Iraq was trying to obtain uranium in Africa was not reliable. One memo was also directed to Rice.� [AP, 7/23/03]

CONDI�S AMAZING IRAQ-NUKE STORY #3 - ADMITS CIA OBJECTED, THEN CLAIMED THAT SHE SIMPLY DIDN�T READ MEMO
Facing questions over Rice�s changing stories, the White House then attempted to deflect criticism by claiming that Rice and Bush both failed to even fully read the intelligence documents they were given - as if negligence obviates responsibility for misleading the nation. As the Washington Post reported, on the eve of war, �President Bush and his national security adviser did not entirely read the most authoritative prewar assessment of U.S. intelligence on Iraq, including a State Department claim that an allegation Bush would later use in his State of the Union address was �highly dubious,� White House officials said.� That assessment, called the National Intelligence Estimate, is considered the U.S. government�s most important intelligence document and contained �a classified, 90-page summary that was the definitive assessment of Iraq�s weapons programs by U.S. intelligence agencies� [Washington Post, 7/19/03]. When asked about Rice�s new claim to not have read critical CIA memos sent directly to her that debunked the Iraq-nuclear claim, Stephen Hadley, Rice�s top aide, admitted �I can�t tell you she read it. But in some sense, it doesn�t matter. Memo sent, we�re on notice.� [AP, 7/23/03]


Condi is one of the Loyal Liars - which is why she gets to keep her job.

No comments: