tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387550.post4912468740698753641..comments2023-07-01T08:55:59.065-05:00Comments on City of Brass: a disagreement among jafisAziz P.http://www.blogger.com/profile/11825546047253660903noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387550.post-42279032028251198852008-03-29T15:32:00.000-05:002008-03-29T15:32:00.000-05:00Damn you, Aziz. You have made it on the 'net! You ...Damn you, Aziz. You have made it on the 'net! You have your own troll that spams endless garbage.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09288388076213922106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387550.post-4873249335460661432008-03-28T15:49:00.000-05:002008-03-28T15:49:00.000-05:00You can not claim to that you represent "moderate"...You can not claim to that you represent "moderate" Muslims while pretending that the lies that men tell when they are terrified produces are gifts toe Muslims.<BR/><BR/>The cartoonist was terrified and lied for the radicals. They won, they stifled his speech, they coerced him into lying.<BR/><BR/>When you accept that lie at at face value, you seem to accept the obeciance of the terrified as your due. You can not accept the gift of terror while disowning the cause of that terror. <BR/><BR/>To disown terror, you must grant the right to honesty by ALL of terror's victims.Nightstudieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02200991662519166944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387550.post-7045815652160830212008-03-28T15:26:00.000-05:002008-03-28T15:26:00.000-05:00I would be nice if YOU could spare a word to actua...I would be nice if YOU could spare a word to actually support your own thesis and show that you are capable of campaigning against the theology of hatred and violence that makes up 100% of the content of the film. <BR/><BR/>THAT is an action that support the attitude you incorrectly projected on cartoonist, but it can only be done at the expense of admitting that the scenes and theology that Wilders underlined is real and a real problem. <BR/><BR/>You can't win by taking a stance of enmity to "the infidel", you have to join the human race and admit the depth of the problem.<BR/><BR/>Years ago, when I argued with you, I used a certain bit of hate speech in my arguments, I used the word "infidel" and you never corrected me and thus, I'm afraid, made my point for me. That's the depth of your problem.Nightstudieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02200991662519166944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387550.post-663378757604849662008-03-28T15:16:00.000-05:002008-03-28T15:16:00.000-05:00Your argument is purely self contradictory and wil...Your argument is purely self contradictory and will not convince anyone.<BR/><BR/><I>Either</I> "In other words, he is really just afraid of the additional publicity [will] actually trigger a genuine StupidStorm of violence" <I>OR</I> he is "endors[ing] the existence of moderate mainstream Islam."<BR/><BR/>You can't have it both ways because the act of cowering in fear of irrational violence is the action that speaks louder than any words, and, once again, supports Wilders thesis.Nightstudieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02200991662519166944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387550.post-50798545288027430772008-03-28T12:56:00.000-05:002008-03-28T12:56:00.000-05:00Now THIS is poetic justice.Now THIS is poetic justice.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16314077522314005109noreply@blogger.com